|
|
Email this page
Since 1989, Solomon Islanders across the nation
have passed judgment on how well--or poorly--the
governments of the day have served people's basic
interests. Over the past 15 years and through six
governments, Solomon citizens have graded their
political masters on how they have served them in
four critical areas of quality of living.
Details
All Report Card scores (as listed in the table)
measure the same four fundamental parts of life:
Health Services, Education opportunities, Resource
help and Availability of Money.
People, rural and urban, men and women, young
and old know well about sickness and getting well,
having their children in school getting a good
education. Solomon Islanders have first hand
experience about their land, forest and sea
resources and how government helps them use them
better, connecting them to markets and assisting
villagers to get the best return on them. Citizens
know what it takes to earn money for daily,
ordinary things of life.
Solomon Islands Development Trust's workers roam
the towns and countryside (over a three week
period) asking individuals to judge government's
work for the people of the nation. In the latest
poll, people--more than 2,000 of them--were asked
to judge the Kemakeza government's track record of
serving the people of the nation over the past 18
months--December 2001-July 2003--the time it was in
power.
In each Report Card, men, women, young men and
young women are asked separately their opinion on
the four fundamentals as listed above. Separate-age
categories are polled because a man's perceptions
may well differ from that of a woman and that of a
woman's differ from a young person, whether male or
female.
Each survey interview, usually done in Pijin
although different local languages are also used,
are recorded by SIDT's field personnel and then
copied to a separate form. Later all marks are
carefully tabulated on a master sheet for
comparison purposes. Each response attracts the
following weights:
| Barava Gud |
100% top mark, very
good, excellent |
| Gud |
75% good mark, above
average |
| Lelebit Gud |
50% minimum pass but
below average |
| Pua |
25% poor, failure, low mark |
ComparisonA quick study across the five
previous Report Cards shows that the most recent
Report Card--the Kemakeza Government--is the lowest
ever recorded since SIDT began its survey service
in1989. The Prime Minister defends his government's
low results because of the social unrest which
gripped the nation over the past five years. There
is some truth to this statement. Sir Allan's
government inherited a weak almost bankrupt
situation when it took over in December 2001.
However, rather than recognizing this condition and
striving to work within the weak economic climate
he had indeed inherited, the Kemakeza Coalition
made matters worse.
The cash flow problem that plagued his
administration was one of its own making.
Unquestioning acceptance of bogus compensation
claims, bowing to militants intimidation demands
and out right theft of government monies and
property became normal operating procedures. Hence,
the non-payment of teachers, doctors, nurses and
public servants salaries, the very ones who service
people's needs, was so poor that in some incidences
teachers' salary payments were up to 6 paydays
late. While parliament members, the PM, his cabinet
and police never once missed a single payment of
their salaries, other public servants were left
stranded to make out the best they could. Is it any
wonder that citizens across the nation--rural,
urban, village and town--marked the government
performance as poor to awful!
When it came to Resource Assistance--helping
people connect with the market (copra, cocoa, fish,
timber, etc.) was much less than people deserved.
The Commodity Export Marketing Authority's
performance in strengthening the copra market was
poor to non-existent. Copra, the villager's main
way of gaining modest amounts of money, rotted
awaiting shipping. When shipping became available,
sufficient money to purchase copra dried up.
Government's attitude towards the rural person
could be summed up: "Saed blong yu!"
SummaryThe present government's poor
service record to its people is spread across all
four sectors of the Report Card. Survey results
should come as no surprise to government ministers.
Solomon Island citizens demands are normally
modest. Most villagers are self-sufficient--grow
their own food, build their own homes, their energy
demands for fuel and light are slight, health
matters are basically in their own hands. However,
modern day demands with its over emphasis on cash
is fast running them into the ground. In basic
terms, most people are becoming poorer each
year.
People look more and more to government to help
them catch up, not for the handout, nor the gift
but simply for assistance in strengthening their
resource base, insure quality education for their
kids and basic medical service to the family. But
government's typical response is demonstrated in
the recent 'mass migration' of government
personnel, cronies and hangers-on attending the
Pacific Forum in Auckland. At a time of
near-bankrupt conditions, Sir Allan's tour group
cost the Treasury over SI$700,000. In the eyes of
more than 2,000 citizens the government has failed
them miserably. This is why people across the
nation have marked the government with the worse
Report Card of any government over the past 15
years.
John
Roughan
17 August 2003
Solomon Islands Governments Report
Card Summary
1989 - 2003
Per Cent (%)
|
Mamaloni
1989-1993 |
Hilly 1993-1994 |
Mamaloni
1994-1995 |
Mamaloni
1995-1996 |
Ulufaalu
1997-1998 |
Kemakeza
2001-2003 |
| Health Services |
47 |
59 |
53 |
53 |
59 |
41 |
| Education |
48 |
55 |
53 |
55 |
60 |
39 |
| Resources |
57 |
55 |
58 |
53 |
61 |
42 |
| Availability of
Money |
40 |
46 |
44 |
48 |
47 |
37 |
| Average Mark |
48 |
54 |
52 |
52 |
57 |
40 |
Source: Solomon Islands Development Trust
(SIDT) 2003
|