<< Home
Subscribe
Login
| My Profile | Why Join?

HOME | Editorial | Environment | Echelon Watch | World Affairs | Nukes | Participatory Democracy | Genetic Engineering | World Trade | Defence | Public Health | Conflict Zones | Economics | Editorial Cartoons


We Support The Aotearoa Independent Media Centre

Gap and Nike: Still No Sweat?

 

 

 

 

 

Email this page

After the BBC broadcast "Gap and Nike: No Sweat:" in October, 2000 there was a pledge from Nike that any underage workers would be sent to school, and would then be free to return to the factory once they'd reached working age. This has not happened.

The reason appears to be that neither the factory June Textiles, nor Nike, are convinced the girls really are underage. One of the joung women involved is also still claiming to be older so she can continue to work.

It has long been a concern of some labour unions, non-government organisations ( NGOs) that the availability of low-priced consumer product in western countries is largely the result of unjust labour practices in the industries of developing countries. Since the 1970s economic development, particularly in Asian countries and the so-called free trade agreements of the 1990s are seen by these groups as encouraging exploitative employment practices if not a modern-day slavery.

Free trade agreements have been seen by many developing countries and most NGOs as far from fair for poorer countries. There are many issues raised when discussing the effects of globalisation on poor people and as an attempt to illustrate the complexities, the BBC’s Panorama documentary entitled "Gap and Nike: No Sweat?" consisted of case-studies. Broadcast in October 2000, produced by Fiona Campbell and fronted by Paul Kenyon, the documentary concentrated on the issue of child labour.

Related links:

The transcript of "Gap and Nike: No Sweat?"

The online video of "Gap and Nike: No Sweat?"

An update of "Gap and Nike: No Sweat?", 21 May 2001

Consumer advice from Save The Children UK

Nike’s "corporate labour responsibility" policy

Gap’s "social responsibility policy"

Ethical Trading Initiative( ETI)

The ETI is an alliance of companies, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), and trade union organisations committed to working together to identify and promote good practice in the implementation of codes of labour practice, including the monitoring and independent verification of the observance of code provisions.

Clean Clothes Campaign (CCC)

The CCC started in the Netherlands in 1990. At that time stores in the Netherlands were not taking any responsibility for the working conditions under which the clothes they sold were made. But we have come a long way since then. Now there are Clean Clothes Campaigns in ten Western European countries. And now it's more difficult to find retailers here who denounce this responsibility.

Community Aid Abroad - The NikeWatch Campaign

In November 1996, Community Aid Abroad (Oxfam in Australia) released a report on working conditions in Nike factories in Indonesia entitled Sweating for Nike. Since then numerous other reports have confirmed that conditions in Nike factories and those of other sportswear companies remain unacceptable. We are asking people to send protest postcards to us so we can deliver them to Nike.

END

Email this page

back to top

 


What's New |Action | email | Feedback | Help? | About | Search | Most Read Pages

HOME | Editorial | Environment | Echelon Watch | World Affairs | Nukes | Participatory Democracy | Genetic Engineering | World Trade | Defence | Public Health | Conflict Zones | Economics | Editorial Cartoons

indymedialogo:
Independent Media Centre Aotearoa

This page was last updated on: Thursday, June 7, 2001 at 5:14:30 AM

 

 

Pick of the week

Greenpeace weblog